Joint hypermobility determined by the Beighton score in university students
PDF (Spanish)

Keywords

Joint hypermobility
medical students

How to Cite

1.
Joint hypermobility determined by the Beighton score in university students. Rev. parag. reumatol. [Internet]. 2019 Jun. 30 [cited 2025 Sep. 13];5(1):8-12. Available from: https://revista.spr.org.py/index.php/spr/article/view/96

Abstract

Introduction: Joint hypermobility (JHM) implies an increased range of motion that exceeds what is considered normal for the examined joint.

Objetive: To determine the frequency of JHM in first-year medical students of the Facultad de Ciencias Médicas of Universidad Nacional de Asunción (FCM-UNA) and its association to gender.

Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. A physical examination was performed using the Beighton scoring system. Individuals who scored 4 or more points were considered to have JHM.

Results: 100 students were included. 38% scored at least 4 points to diagnose them with JHM. 1% met all criteria. The item that evaluates forward bending of the spine was the most frequent among students. 84.2% of the individuals with criteria for JHM were women. There is a significant difference between the presence of JHM between women and men (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: There is a substantial amount of individuals who meet JHM criteria among first-year medical students of the FCM-UNA. Women were identified with JHM more frequently than men.

PDF (Spanish)

References

(1) Singh H, McKay M, Baldwin J, Nicholson L, Chan C, Burns J, et al. Beighton scores and cut-offs across the lifespan: cross-sectional study of an Australian population. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2017;56(11):1857-64.

(2) Syx D, De Wandele I, Rombaut L, Malfait F. Hypermobility, the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and chronic pain. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2017;35 Suppl 107(5):116-22.

(3) Beighton P, Solomon L, Soskolne CL. Articular mobility in an African population. Ann Rheum Dis. 1973;32(5):413-8.

(4) Kumar B, Lenert P. Joint Hypermobility Syndrome: Recognizing a Commonly Overlooked Cause of Chronic Pain. The American journal of medicine. 2017;130(6):640-7.

(5) Birrell FN, Adebajo AO, Hazleman BL, Silman AJ. High prevalence of joint laxity in West Africans. British journal of rheumatology. 1994;33(1):56-9.

(6) Kwon JW, Lee WJ, Park SB, Kim MJ, Jang SH, Choi CK. Generalized joint hypermobility in healthy female koreans: prevalence and age-related differences. Annals of rehabilitation medicine. 2013;37(6):832-8.

(7) Al-Rawi ZS, Al-Aszawi AJ, Al-Chalabi T. Joint mobility among university students in Iraq. British journal of rheumatology. 1985;24(4):326-31.

(8) Reuter PR, Fichthorn KR. Prevalence of generalized joint hypermobility, musculoskeletal injuries, and chronic musculoskeletal pain among American university students. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7625.

(9) Russek LN, Errico DM. Prevalence, injury rate and, symptom frequency in generalized joint laxity and joint hypermobility syndrome in a "healthy" college population. Clinical rheumatology. 2016;35(4):1029-39.

(10) Antonio DH, Magalhaes CS. Survey on joint hypermobility in university students aged 18-25 years old. Advances in rheumatology (London, England). 2018;58(1):3.

(11) Wood PH. Is hypermobility a discrete entity? Proc R Soc Med. 1971;64(6):690-2.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.